>
 Sunday, May 08, 2005
« ClickOnce Publishing Issues with Beta 2 | Main | Presentation in Orange County 5/7- Deplo... »

Ok, I noticed a few other little things about the publishing process through Visual Studio 2005, related to Beta 2. So, in an effort to save you all the 45 minutes I wasted on some of these things, here's the list. Luckily, I was somewhat aprised of this before I did my presentation yesterday, however, it still ate up some demo time given that things didn't always work the first time...

1. Publishing will continue even if you can't successfully build (see my previous post), so I recommend you always try to build first and watch your output. I know what you are thinking: “Oh, I'll just publish and check the output window for errors before I run the app”. But, I guarantee you will be sometimes seduced by that little browser window with the “Install” button...and you'll forget...and you'll find a bug...and you'll try to think about what the problem is but really you didn't get the latest assembly (or, worse, the assembly you're referencing never was built).

2. The “Properties” tab doesn't appear to be saved as part of the build step. So, if you make changes they won't be reflected when you publish...another ghost. The problem is, it still increments the published version, so you “think“ you have it.

3. Sometimes, not always, if you don't version your assemblies, the updated code is not deployed with the newly published version. This problem seems strange to me, since the published application version has been incremented...however I haven't had time yet to inspect what the cause of this is, in terms of the server deployment and its files.

If I see any more problems, or find a solution for these issues...I'll update this post. Feel free to comment if you find it before I do, I'm about to bury myself in ASP.NET 2.0 and Indigo for the next few weeks, I won't have much time for ClickOnce...

 

5/8/2005 4:46 PM .NET | ClickOnce  | Comments [2]  |  View reactions  |  Trackback
Sunday, September 18, 2005 5:12:33 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
and what bugs me is that there seems to be no options to link the app version and the publish version!!!

I'd like a nice simple way to say:

on build update the app's assembly info version by x.y.z ( default of z+1 )
then publish the app with that same number.

so that if the app was: 1.0.0.100

then running publish would make it 1.0.0.101 for both the assembly and the download.

have an option to bump by other steps like

*.10
meaning: was 1.0.0.100 ==> now 1.0.0.110
or
*.10.*
meaning: was 1.0.10.1234 ==> now 1.0.20.1234
and so on....
denny
Thursday, December 06, 2007 6:58:45 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
olbyeh kqdlthspo gzvyxjtou frjwzliaq dkibuz jepylqf mapy
Name
E-mail
(will show your gravatar icon)
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

    ON THIS PAGE
    SEARCH
    CATEGORIES
    ARCHIVES
    BLOGROLL

Designed by NUKEATION STUDIOS